POLITICS
If You Can Deny The People Of Ikwuano/Umuahia Federal Constituency Palliatives Rice, What Would You Not Sell Them For? – Mandate 27 Queries Aguocha
If You Can Deny The People Of Ikwuano/Umuahia Federal Constituency Palliatives Rice, What Would You Not Sell Them For? – Mandate 27 Queries Aguocha
Obi Aguocha, the people of Ikwuano, Umuahia North and Umuahia South have a simple question for you today, and it is about rice.
Not a road. Not a hospital. Not a bill with a long Latin name. Ordinary rice. A palliative from the Federal Government, meant to ease hunger in a time of hardship, shared out through lawmakers like you so that the market woman, the okada rider, the widow and the pensioner could put food on the table.
Where did it go?
Every constituent knows that palliatives were meant to reach the people. Yet after 3 years and 9 months in the Green Chamber, ask around the 32 wards and you will struggle to find ten households who will say, “Yes, rice came to us, and it came through Obi Aguocha.” If the rice came, who received it? How many bags? Which wards? Which communities? On what date, and where is the beneficiary list?
These are not complicated questions. A palliative is not a private gift. It is a public resource, funded by the same Nigerians who are hungry, and it comes with a duty to account for every bag. When a federal lawmaker receives such an intervention for his constituency, the people are entitled to know what arrived, what was shared, and who benefited.
A man who can look at his own people’s hunger and still give them nothing is a man the people must watch carefully. Because if you can deny them ordinary rice, what else can you deny them? And if rice can be withheld, then a darker question follows. If your constituents can be shortchanged over something so small, how cheaply can they be sold out for something big?
That is the heart of this matter, Honourable. Representation is not measured by speeches, photographs or long press statements written by your media team. It is measured by what reaches the household. It is measured by whether a mother in Ikwuano, a trader in Umuahia North or a pensioner in Umuahia South can say, “That came from my representative.”
The people are not asking for a miracle. They are asking for a record. Publish the quantity of palliative rice and other federal interventions that came to your office since 2023. Publish the distribution list. Name the wards. Name the communities. Let any constituent verify it. If every bag reached the people, you have nothing to fear and every reason to speak up. If it did not, then you owe Ndi Abia an explanation that no media statement can supply.
You cannot lecture Abians about accountability while your own palliative trail is a mystery. You cannot ask for another term while the people you represent cannot say what they received from you. And you cannot keep your media team shouting at opponents while the simplest question, who got the rice, goes unanswered.
Hunger does not care about propaganda. A family that missed a meal because a palliative never arrived will not be fed by a press release, and a child who went to bed empty will not understand the language of political rebuttals.
So, Honourable, the question stands. Where is the rice, who received it, and why can you not prove it? Answer plainly, with names, wards and numbers.
The people have been patient, but patience has a way of turning into a vote
